Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BIKBULATOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (1)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 10919/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR - 47107/14

  On 13 January 2011 the European Court of Human Rights found in the case of Mikhalkova and Others v. Ukraine (no. 10919/05) that there had been substantive violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention as regards Vasiliy Mikhalkov's death and his inhuman treatment.

  The applicants complain that following the Court's judgment in the case of Mikhalkova and Others v. Ukraine (no. 10919/05, 13 January 2011) the subsequent criminal proceedings concerning the death of their relative were ineffective and they were deliberately delayed by the authorities which amounted to a new violation of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention.

  With respect to the period after the Court's judgment in the case of Mikhalkova and Others v. Ukraine (no. 10919/05, 13 January 2011), did the investigating authorities and the courts comply with the procedural requirements of Article 2 of the Convention? Did they act with the requisite diligence and promptness in view of the statute of limitations provided for in domestic law?.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.12.2024 - 2705/20

  BELEY v. UKRAINE

  That approach has been applied by the Court in a number of cases under Article 3 so far (see, for example, V.D. v. Croatia (no. 2), no. 19421/15, § 54, 15 November 2018; Gheorghe Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 21171/16 [Committee], § 31, 7 May 2020; and Bikbulatova and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 47107/14, 7 April 2022, all finding no violation).