Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOBIERAJSKA-NIERZWICKA v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 49349/99
• EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points (see Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, No. 28957/95, 3 July 2002, § 124).
• EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79

  Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

  They relied in this respect on the Zimmerman and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983 (Series A no. 66, p. 35, § 36).
• LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08

  Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

  27/08/2003.
• EGMR, 03.12.2002 - 30218/96

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens / des Familienlebens (Rechte inhaftierter …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

  Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to her under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Nowicka v. Poland, no. 30218/96, § 82, 3 December 2002, unreported).
• EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 35843/97

  MALINOWSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 49349/99

  However, it considers that the applicant has not shown that the legal costs and expenses claimed by her were incurred in order to prompt domestic courts to comply with the requirements of Article 6 § 1. The Court accordingly dismisses the claim (see, mutatis mutandis, Malinowska v. Poland, no. 35843/97, § 105, 14 December 2000).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 41957/04

  KHARITONASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The domestic courts could also have fixed firm time-limits for the authorities" submission of requested documents and expert opinions (see, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, § 90, 23 September 2004; Peryt v. Poland, no. 42042/98, § 57, 2 December 2003; Sobierajska-Nierzwicka v. Poland, no. 49349/99, § 112, 27 May 2003).