Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TIM HENRIK BRUUN HANSEN v. DENMARK

  Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-a - After conviction);Non-pecuniary damage - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HANSEN v. DENMARK

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15
• EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 51072/15

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit Hooligans

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15

  The general principles under Article 5 of the Convention were recently set out in, for instance, S., V. and A. v. Denmark ([GC] nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, §§ 73-76, 22 October 2018).
• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 53783/09

  Vereinbarkeit der Unterbringung und der Fortdauer der Unterbringung einer …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15

  The Court's task is to review under the Convention the decisions of those authorities (see, for example, Ruiz Rivera, cited above, § 62, and Graf v. Germany (dec.), 53783/09, 18 October 2011).
• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 67725/10

  C.W. c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15

  The Court has held that in such circumstances, detention which complied with Article 5 § 1 (a) at the outset would be transformed into deprivation of liberty that was arbitrary and, hence, incompatible with that provision" (ibid., § 112; compare also, among other authorities, C.W. v. Switzerland, no. 67725/10, §§ 47-48, 23 September 2014 and Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 130, 4 December 2018).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 3912/15

  MÓRY v. SLOVAKIA and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15

  The Court reiterates that to deprive an applicant of victim status the authorities must fulfil two conditions: acknowledge, at least in essence, a violation of the Convention, and provide the applicant with "sufficient redress" (see Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III; see also, as more recent authorities, Móry and Benc v. Slovakia, nos. 3912/15 and 7675/15, § 25, 22 January 2019 and Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, § 129, 31 January 2019).
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 75378/13

  M.T. v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 51072/15

  Also in the context of a review under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention of the psychiatric detention of a person considered to be of unsound mind within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (e), the Court has confirmed that when some time has elapsed since the last medical assessment, and the situation has ended in deadlock, due to a breakdown in the relationship of trust with the staff of the institution in which the person concerned was placed, the national authorities "should at least have sought the opinion of an external medical expert" (see, Ruiz Rivera, cited above, § 64, and contrast with M.T. v. Estonia, no. 75378/13, § 68, 23 October 2018).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen