Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MALETS v. UKRAINE and 13 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (16)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 14057/17

  SUKACHOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Did the material conditions of the applicants' detention amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020)?.

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: poor quality of food; lack or insufficient quantity of food; no or restricted access to warm water; infestation with insects/rodents; inadequate temperature; mouldy or dirty cell (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; lack of fresh air; poor quality of food; infestation with insects/rodents; inadequate temperature; mouldy or dirty cell; applicant transported on numerous occasions (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; lack of fresh air; inadequate temperature; passive smoking; no or restricted access to shower; poor quality of potable water; poor quality of food; lack of bed linen; lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities; lack of toiletries; lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: inadequate temperature; lack of toiletries; no or restricted access to running water; lack of privacy for toilet; lack of or insufficient natural and electric light (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; lack of bed linen; mouldy or dirty cell; no access to warm water; infestation of cell with insects/rodents; poor quality of food (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020) and transportation in a prison van (see Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 107-9, 25 October 2007);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention in Temnivka Detention Facility no. 100: overcrowding; mouldy cell; lack of fresh air; lack of natural light; insufficient electric light; lack of privacy for toilet; no access to running water; restricted access to shower; insufficient physical exercise in fresh air; insufficient quantity and poor quality of food; poor quality of potable water; lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; mouldy or dirty cell; infestation of cell with insects/rodents; lack of fresh air; inadequate temperature; lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air; detention of women together with men (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; mouldy or dirty cell; infestation of cell with insects/rodents; lack of fresh air; inadequate temperature; lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen; lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities; lack of toiletries; no or restricted access to potable water; no or restricted access to warm water; lack of privacy for toilet; lack of or insufficient natural and electric light; restricted access to shower; lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air; insufficient quantity and poor quality of food (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 118-23, 30 January 2020).

• EGMR, 01.07.2021 - 15360/10

  NECHAY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Was the length of the criminal proceedings in the present cases in breach of the "reasonable time" requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 69-72, 1 July 2021)?.

  Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for the above complaint, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 76-79, 1 July 2021)?.

  1 level of jurisdiction (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 69-72, 1 July 2021);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of the allegedly excessive length of criminal proceedings (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 76-79, 1 July 2021).

  2 levels of jurisdiction (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 69-72, 1 July 2021);.

  Article 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of the allegedly excessive length of criminal proceedings (see Nechay v. Ukraine, no. 15360/10, §§ 76-79, 1 July 2021).

• EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 49872/11

  Untersuchungshaft Timoschenkos "rechtswidrig"

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Did the applicant have an effective and enforceable right to compensation for the alleged violations of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, as required by its Article 5 § 5 (see Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872/11, §§ 286-87, 30 April 2013, and Kotiy v. Ukraine, no. 28718/09, § 55, 5 March 2015)?.

  Article 5 § 5 - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the alleged violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention - no effective right to compensation in domestic legal system for the violations of Article 5 § 3 (see Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872/11, §§ 286-87, 30 April 2013, and Kotiy v. Ukraine, no. 28718/09, § 55, 5 March 2015).

• VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Vinnytsia Detention Facility No. 1, 13/04/2023 - 09/05/2024.

  Article 5 § 3 - lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for pre-trial detention; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasons employed by the domestic courts as the case progressed from 13/04/2023 to 09/05/2024 (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, and Ignatov v. Ukraine, no. 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016);.

• EGMR, 05.03.2015 - 28718/09

  KOTIY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Did the applicant have an effective and enforceable right to compensation for the alleged violations of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, as required by its Article 5 § 5 (see Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872/11, §§ 286-87, 30 April 2013, and Kotiy v. Ukraine, no. 28718/09, § 55, 5 March 2015)?.

  Article 5 § 5 - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the alleged violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention - no effective right to compensation in domestic legal system for the violations of Article 5 § 3 (see Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872/11, §§ 286-87, 30 April 2013, and Kotiy v. Ukraine, no. 28718/09, § 55, 5 March 2015).

• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 40583/15

  IGNATOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  Article 5 § 3 - alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for pre-trial detention; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasons employed by the domestic courts as the case progressed from 28/01/2020 to 08/02/2023 (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, 1gnatov v. Ukraine, no. 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016);.

  Article 5 § 3 - lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for pre-trial detention; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasons employed by the domestic courts as the case progressed from 13/04/2023 to 09/05/2024 (see Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, §§ 77-81, 10 February 2011, and Ignatov v. Ukraine, no. 40583/15, §§ 38-42, 15 December 2016);.

• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 15825/06

  YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  As regards application no. 22858/24, were the conditions of the applicant's transportation between the detention facility and courts compatible with Article 3 of the Convention (see Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 107-9, 25 October 2007)?.

  Article 3 - inadequate conditions of detention: overcrowding; lack of bed linen; mouldy or dirty cell; no access to warm water; infestation of cell with insects/rodents; poor quality of food (see Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, §§ 89-100, 30 January 2020) and transportation in a prison van (see Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 107-9, 25 October 2007);.

• EGMR, 05.07.2018 - 24/11

  CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  19/10/2020 - 24/11/2022.
• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 15/02

  DURUK ET YÜCEDAG c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  15/02/2024 - 04/09/2024.
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 11/04

  VOTTO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR - 43301/22

  11/04/2023 - 07/09/2023.
• EGMR, 17.09.2020 - 58444/15

  GRUBNYK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 26744/16

  KORBAN v. UKRAINE
• VK Niedersachsen, 14.10.2002 - 22/02

  Eignung: zeitliche Berücksichtigung eines früheren vertragswidrigen Verhaltens …
• RG, 05.06.1905 - 27/05

  1. Unter welchen Voraussetzungen erfüllt das Entgehen eines Gewinnes im …
• RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03

  Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Berlin, 05.01.2026 - 40 L 524.25

  Anspruch auf Erteilung eines Visums nach § 23 Abs. 2 AufenthG 2004 bei …

  Sie haben glaubhaft gemacht, dass noch vor Abschluss des auf die Erteilung der begehrten Visa gerichteten Klageverfahrens in der Hauptsache (VG 40 K 525/25 V) die Gefahr einer Abschiebung von Pakistan nach Afghanistan besteht, wo ihnen schwere und unzumutbare Nachteile drohen (…vgl. insoweit auch: Beschluss der Kammer vom 25. November 2025 - VG 40 L 471/25 V - juris Rn. 36 ff. m.w.N.).