Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14, 42819/14, 64339/14, 5818/15, 30197/15 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SZEKERES AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SZEKERES v. HUNGARY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR - 5818/15 (anhängig)
KÓTÉ v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
5818/15 and 30197/15 also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.5818/15 and 30197/15, the applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Bandur v. Hungary (no. 50130/12, § 84, 5 July 2016), as regards application no. 5818/15, and Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015) and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia (no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018), as regards application no. 30197/15.
Holds that application no. 5818/15 discloses a breach of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention concerning the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention;.
5818/15.
- EGMR - 30197/15 (anhängig)
PÉNTEK v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
5818/15 and 30197/15 also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.5818/15 and 30197/15, the applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Bandur v. Hungary (no. 50130/12, § 84, 5 July 2016), as regards application no. 5818/15, and Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015) and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia (no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018), as regards application no. 30197/15.
Holds that application no. 30197/15 discloses a breach of Article 8 of the Convention concerning the protracted restriction on prison visits;.
30197/15.
- EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Bandur v. Hungary (no. 50130/12, § 84, 5 July 2016), as regards application no. 5818/15, and Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015) and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia (no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018), as regards application no. 30197/15.According to the Court's well-established case-law in this field, this amounts to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015, and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018).
- EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 43149/10
SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Bandur v. Hungary (no. 50130/12, § 84, 5 July 2016), as regards application no. 5818/15, and Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015) and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia (no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018), as regards application no. 30197/15.According to the Court's well-established case-law in this field, this amounts to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015, and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018).
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11
GAL v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
In the leading case of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02
LIGERES v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
17/02/2012 to 06/11/2012 (date of 1st instance conviction);. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
13/12/1977. - KAG Münster, 12.07.2010 - 28/09
Einführung einer Verteilung der Dienstzeiten auf 5,5 Tage-Woche; Verstoß gegen §§ …
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
28/09/2011 to. - KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
15/06/2015. - EGMR - 64339/14 (anhängig)
MOLNÁRNÉ L?WY v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
64339/14. - EGMR - 42819/14 (anhängig)
KOSZTADINOVSZKI v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 50130/12
BANDUR v. HUNGARY
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 5818/15 |
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
KÓTÉ v. HUNGARY
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 50130/12
BANDUR v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR - 5818/15
Was the length of the applicant's pre-trial detention and house arrest in breach of the "reasonable time" requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Bandur v. Hungary, no. 50130/12, 5 July 2016)?.Was the procedure by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention in conformity with Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Bandur v. Hungary, no. 50130/12, 5 July 2016)? In particular, was the principle of equality of arms between the applicant and the prosecution respected in the present case?.
- EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14
SZEKERES v. HUNGARY
5818/15 and 30197/15 also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.5818/15 and 30197/15, the applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Bandur v. Hungary (no. 50130/12, § 84, 5 July 2016), as regards application no. 5818/15, and Khoroshenko v. Russia ([GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 148-49, ECHR 2015) and Andrey Smirnov v. Russia (no. 43149/10, § 57, 13 February 2018), as regards application no. 30197/15.
Holds that application no. 5818/15 discloses a breach of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention concerning the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention;.
5818/15.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".