Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 18 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15

  Having regard to the submissions of the parties and the Court's findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention regarding the general context surrounding the case (see in particular paragraphs 53-54 above), the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the present complaint (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Haziyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 19842/15, § 44, 6 December 2018; and Atilla Tas v. Turkey, no. 72/17, § 196, 19 January 2021).
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 72/17

  ATILLA TAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15

  Having regard to the submissions of the parties and the Court's findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention regarding the general context surrounding the case (see in particular paragraphs 53-54 above), the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the present complaint (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Haziyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 19842/15, § 44, 6 December 2018; and Atilla Tas v. Turkey, no. 72/17, § 196, 19 January 2021).
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15

  Having regard to the submissions of the parties and the Court's findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention regarding the general context surrounding the case (see in particular paragraphs 53-54 above), the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the present complaint (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Haziyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 19842/15, § 44, 6 December 2018; and Atilla Tas v. Turkey, no. 72/17, § 196, 19 January 2021).

• EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16

  EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the case, and that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Bagirov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 81024/12 and 28198/15, § 106, 25 June 2020; and Ayyubzade v. Azerbaijan, no. 6180/15, § 60, 2 March 2023).