Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUMANZHINOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article ...

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 11.07.2014 - 13/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  13/12/1971.
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  10/09/1957.
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  The question of whether or not a period of detention is reasonable cannot be assessed in the abstract but must be assessed in each case according to its special features (see, mutatis mutandis, McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-45, ECHR 2006-X) and that the arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 173, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), but contain references to the specific facts and the applicant's personal circumstances justifying his detention.
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  The question of whether or not a period of detention is reasonable cannot be assessed in the abstract but must be assessed in each case according to its special features (see, mutatis mutandis, McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-45, ECHR 2006-X) and that the arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 173, ECHR 2005-X (extracts)), but contain references to the specific facts and the applicant's personal circumstances justifying his detention.
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 724/18

  For relevant provisions of the domestic law and practice, see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 23-25, 17 July 2014.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG Düsseldorf, 01.07.2025 - 24 L 363/25

  Zu Recht ausgewiesener Sexualstraftäter darf trotz Psychose in die Türkei …

  Mit Strafbefehl des Amtsgerichts O. vom 14. Februar 2019 wurde er wegen Körperverletzung und Beleidigung zu einer Geldstrafe von 40 Tagessätzen verurteilt (300 JS 736/18 6 CS 82/19).
• LG Bonn, 06.06.2019 - 21 KLs 28/18
  664 Js 724/18.
• EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 38042/18

  A.K. v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  Accordingly, in the light of these considerations and given the recurrent findings of violations of Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention in respect of foreigners or stateless persons detained virtually indefinitely in Russia with a view to their administrative expulsion (see R.K. v. Russia, no. 30261/17, §§ 62-5, 8 October 2019; L.M. and Others v. Russia, cited above, §§ 145-52; Mumanzhinova and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 724/18 and eight others, §§ 17-26, 8 October 2019; Ismailov v. Russia [Committee], no. 45852/17, §§ 22-3, 24 September 2019; and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 29957/14 and eight others, §§ 62-6, 12 December 2017), the Court finds that the length of the detention of A.K. and A.Y. exceeded what was reasonably required for the purpose pursued and that their detention became a punitive rather than a preventive measure.
• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 59387/18

  RASULOV v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Mumanzhinova and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 724/18 and 8 others, 8 October 2019), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.
• EGMR, 15.12.2022 - 31147/20

  GASHKOV v. RUSSIA

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Mumanzhinova and Others v. Russia, nos. 724/18 and 8 others, 8 October 2019 (Committee)), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.