Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SULAIMAN AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.03.2023 - 13152/20

  RASIMOGLOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  In application no. 9681/22, introduced on 14 February 2022, the applicant also omitted to inform the Court of his previous application no. 43946/21, which had been communicated to the Government on 3 February 2022.

  Application no. 43946/21 was struck out of the Court's list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention, on the basis of a friendly settlement by decision Rasimoglou and Others v. Greece ([Committee] (dec.), nos.

  13152/20 and 50 others, 23 March 2023).

  Finally, the applicant in application no. 14233/22, introduced on 11 March 2022, failed to notify the Court of his previous application no. 127/22, which had been lodged on 13 October 2021 and had been communicated to the Government on 2 June 2022.

  Application no. 127/22 was struck out of the Court's list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention, on the basis of a friendly settlement by Rasimoglou and Others v. Greece decision, cited above.

  43946/21.

  127/22.

• LG Bonn, 25.09.2008 - 27 Qs 5/08

  Rechtmäßigkeit einer Durchsuchung von Geschäftsräumen aufgrund des Verdachts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  27/08/2021.
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Burka-Verbot: In Würde verschleiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  Incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information in question concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 67, ECHR 2014).

• EGMR, 03.12.2019 - 57242/13

  BELOSEVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  In this regard, the Court has noted that whenever an applicant omits to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular circumstances of the case, the Court may draw such inferences as it deems appropriate, including by striking the application out under either of the three sub-paragraphs of Article 37 § 1 of the Convention (see Belošević v. Croatia (dec.), no. 57242/13, § 48, 3 December 2019).
• EGMR, 09.07.2024 - 21714/22

  MAMIC v. CROATIA and 2 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  21714/22 and 2 others, § 116, 9 July 2024).
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 9602/15

  BENCHEREF v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  In the event where an application is knowingly based on untrue facts, the Court has noted that this type of abuse may also be committed by omission, where the applicant fails to inform the Court of a factor essential for the examination of the case or of new, important developments which occurred during the proceedings before the Court (see Bencheref v. Sweden (dec.), no. 9602/15, § 37, 5 December 2017).
• EGMR, 02.02.2023 - 17215/21

  MIAH AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  17215/21 and 49 others, 2 February 2023).
• EGMR, 28.01.2025 - 44291/21

  SATUF AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 8167/22

  44291/21 and 4 others, 28 January 2025).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen