Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAYK GRIGORYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• otto-schmidt.de (Kurzinformation)

  Meinungsfreiheit - Armenien: Polizeilicher Übergriff auf Journalisten und Beschlagnahmung seiner Kamera

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GRIGORYAN v. ARMENIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  The Court reiterates that where acts that constitute serious offences are directed against a person's physical or mental integrity, only efficient criminal-law mechanisms can ensure adequate protection and serve as a deterrent factor (see Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 86, 12 May 2015).
• EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

  McFarlane v. Ireland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  In addition, the speed of the procedure for remedial action may also be relevant to whether it is practically effective in the particular circumstances of a given case for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 123, 10 September 2010).
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 15367/14

  SHMORGUNOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  In so far as the applicant acted diligently by cooperating with the ongoing investigation, including after the lodging of his application, and having regard to the considerations in the preceding paragraphs, the Court cannot accept that his application should now be rejected as premature (compare Shmorgunov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 15367/14 and 13 others, § 302, 21 January 2021).

• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 201/17

  MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  Rn. 73 According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, among many authorities, Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary [GC], no. 201/17, § 125, 20 January 2020).
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  Rn. 60 The Court reiterates that measures of the public authorities preventing journalists from doing their work or adversely affecting the exercise of their functions may raise issues under Article 10 (see Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 83, ECHR 2015, and Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 68, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 1172/12

  MAMMADOV AND ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  Rn. 63 In such circumstances, the Court does not consider it necessary to establish whether, as argued by the applicant, the police officers had also deleted his video footage from the camera or had seized his mobile phone because the foregoing considerations are sufficient to conclude that the attack on the applicant and the seizure of his camera while he was filming, seriously hampered the exercise of his right to receive and impart information (compare, Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, § 62, 8 July 2021).
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 61737/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 9796/17

  The Court therefore makes no award under this head (compare Dareskizb Ltd v. Armenia, no. 61737/08, § 100, 21 September 2021).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.12.2025 - 13186/20

  Gewaltsame Auflösung der georgischen Proteste: Polizeieinsatz war unmenschliche …

  Il en va de même des arrestations de journalistes qui sont en train de couvrir une manifestation (Pentikäinen c. Finlande [GC], no 11882/10, § 83, CEDH 2015), ainsi que des mesures qui entravent l'utilisation du matériel professionnel des journalistes, par exemple celles consistant à leur retirer ce matériel (voir Hayk Grigoryan c. Arménie, no 9796/17, §§ 61-63, 3 avril 2025, et, mutatis mutandis, Mammadov et Abbasov c. Azerbaïdjan, no 1172/12, § 60 et 62, 8 juillet 2021).
• EGMR, 26.03.2026 - 10761/16

  YENOKYAN v. ARMENIA

  Rn. 29 Having regard to the documents in its possession and its case-law (see, among many other authorities, Stevan Petrović v. Serbia, nos. 6097/16 and 28999/19, § 186, 20 April 2021), the Court rejects the claim for legal costs because there is nothing in the case file to suggest that the applicant has paid or was under an obligation to pay his representative (see Hayk Grigoryan v. Armenia, no. 9796/17, § 73, 3 April 2025).