Rechtsprechung
| RG, 08.07.1891 - Rep. V. 98/91 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Wolters Kluwer(Abodienst, Leitsatz/Tenor frei) (Leitsatz und Volltext)
Bebauungsplan.
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Papierfundstellen
- RGZ 28, 275
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Zitiert selbst (1)
- RG, 14.01.1882 - V 733/81
Inkrafttreten von für Städte und ländliche Ortschaften angeordneten …
Auszug aus RG, 08.07.1891 - V 98/91
des R.G.'s in Civils. Bd. 6 S. 295.
- EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 50419/07
BAKIC v. MONTENEGRO
The first set of proceedings (no. R. 98/91).In 2004 one of the applicant's relatives brought proceedings before the Kolašin First Instance Court, against the applicant and two of his relatives, seeking division of their jointly owned property, which issue was already being considered in another case (no. R. 98/91).
On 22 July 2004 the applicant and two of his relatives brought a claim before the Kolašin First Instance Court, against one of their relatives, seeking to establish their property rights on a certain piece of real estate, which issue was already being considered in other sets of proceedings (nos. R. 98/91 and R. 13/04).
As regards the first set of proceedings (no. R. 98/91, see also paragraphs 4-5 above).
In particular, he omitted to inform the Court that: (a) proceedings no. R. 98/91 had been completed by 1 May 2005 (see paragraphs 4-5 and 28-29 above); (b) proceedings no. R. 13/04 had been discontinued on 5 May 2004 pending the outcome of proceedings no. P. 208/04 (see paragraphs 6-7 and 30-31 above); (c) proceedings nos.
The applicant contested the Government's submissions and maintained that he had never received the decision on the rejection of his claim rendered in proceedings no. R. 98/91, nor that had he been summoned to any hearing in those proceedings.
R. 98/91 and P. 133/05 had been completed by 1 May 2005 and 22 April 2009 respectively (see paragraphs 28-29 and 34-35 above) and that proceedings nos.
In his letter of 19 July 2017, sent in response to the Government's observations, the applicant merely stated that he had never received the decision on the rejection of his claim rendered in proceedings no. R. 98/91, and that the decisions of 23 June 2008 were forgeries (see paragraph 38 above), but did not submit any relevant evidence in support of his allegations.
- BGH, 28.03.1955 - III ZR 24/54
Vorbereitende Baupläne keine Enteignung
Es ist zwar in der Rechtsprechung anerkannt (RGZ 28, 275 [277]; 126, 356 [360]; 140, 276 [288]), dass die Baupolizei zu der ablehnenden Bescheidung eines Baugesuches auch dann befugt ist, wenn das Verfahren über die Festsetzung der Baufluchtlinie noch nicht offengelegt ist, weil die Baupolizeibehörde auch dann in öffentlichem Interesse handelt, wenn sie nur im Hinblick auf eine für die Zukunft in Aussicht genommene Fluchtlinie zu deren Sicherung vorsorglich die Baugenehmigung versagt; in diesem Fall tritt eine Entschädigungspflicht wegen Aufopferung nach § 75 Einl ALR ein. - EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 77720/01
TERENI v. SLOVAKIA
First proceedings concerning the applicant"s dismissal (Levice District Court file 6C 98/91).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".