Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,30594
EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,30594)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12.02.2004 - 47287/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,30594)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 12. Februar 2004 - 47287/99 (https://dejure.org/2004,30594)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,30594) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (181)Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    Thus, the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence cannot be asserted independently: it must be indissociable from the victim's exercise of a right to bring civil proceedings in domestic law, even if only to secure symbolic reparation or to protect a civil right such as the right to a "good reputation" (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 13, § 27; Helmers, cited above, p. 14, § 27; and Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, p. 78, § 58).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

    DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    Simply because the requirements inherent in the concept of a "fair trial" are not necessarily the same in disputes about civil rights and obligations as they are in cases involving criminal trials, as evidenced by the fact that for civil disputes there are no detailed provisions similar to those in Article 6 §§ 2 and 3 (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 32) does not mean that the Court can ignore the plight of victims and downgrade their rights.
  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    The purpose of the Convention being to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33), this right can only be seen to be effective if the observations are actually "heard", that is duly considered by the trial court.
     
  • EGMR, 22.06.2000 - 32492/96

    COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    In any event it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to resolve problems of interpretation of national legislation (see Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 115, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90

    VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    In other words, the effect of Article 6 is, among others, to place the "tribunal" under a duty to conduct a proper examination of the submissions, arguments and evidence adduced by the parties, without prejudice to its assessment of whether they are relevant (see Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 19, § 59).
  • EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

    TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    Thus, the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence cannot be asserted independently: it must be indissociable from the victim's exercise of a right to bring civil proceedings in domestic law, even if only to secure symbolic reparation or to protect a civil right such as the right to a "good reputation" (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 13, § 27; Helmers, cited above, p. 14, § 27; and Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, p. 78, § 58).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 35237/97

    ADOUD ET BOSONI c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    In any event, the waiver of such a right must be established, where appropriate, in an unequivocal manner (see, mutatis mutandis, Colozza and Rubinat v. Italy, judgment of 12 February 1985, Series A no. 89, pp. 14-15, § 28, and Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 46, ECHR 2002-VII).
  • EGMR, 29.08.2000 - 40490/98

    JAHNKE and LENOBLE v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    Moreover, while Article 6 § 1 does oblige the courts to give reasons for their decisions, it cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument (ibid., p. 20, § 61, and Ruiz Torija v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-A, p. 12, § 29; see also Jahnke and Lenoble v. France (dec.), no. 40490/98, ECHR 2000-IX).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

    König ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    The Court notes that, although it has found the concept of "civil rights and obligations" to be autonomous, it has also held that, in this context, the legislation of the State concerned is not without importance (see König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, p. 30, § 89).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

    CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
    The Court further notes that, even where criminal proceedings are determinative only of a criminal charge, the decisive factor for the applicability of Article 6 § 1 is whether, from the moment when the applicant is joined as a civil party until the conclusion of those criminal proceedings, the civil component remains closely connected with the criminal component (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 62, ECHR 2002-I), in other words whether the criminal proceedings affect the civil component.
  • EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85

    HELMERS c. SUÈDE

  • EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

    TOMASI c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88

    ZANDER v. SWEDEN

  • EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90

    KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND

  • EGMR, 03.12.2002 - 48221/99

    BERGER v. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 59433/18

    EGMR zu den Rechten von Beamten: Lehrer dürften nicht streiken

    La Cour rappelle que si l'article 6 § 1 oblige effectivement les tribunaux à motiver leurs décisions, cette obligation ne peut se comprendre comme exigeant une réponse détaillée à chaque argument (Perez c. France [GC], no 47287/99, § 81, CEDH 2004-I).
  • EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 25965/04

    RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA

    The Court observes at the outset that Article 6 does not give rise to a right to have criminal proceedings instituted in a particular case or to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence (see, for example, Rampogna and Murgia v. Italy (dec.), no. 40753/98, 11 May 1999; Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I; and Dinchev v. Bulgaria, no. 23057/03, § 39, 22 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

    DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

    In particular, it reiterates that it is not its function to deal with alleged errors of law or fact committed by the national courts unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, for example, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, and Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 82, ECHR 2004-I), for instance where they can be said to amount to "unfairness" in breach of Article 6 of the Convention.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht