Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RADVAK AND RADVAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  The Court reiterates that the remedy under Article 127 of the Constitution is likely to provide appropriate and sufficient redress to applicants where it allows for examination of the length of the proceedings complained of (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 158 and 159, ECHR 2000-XI, and Andrásik and Others cited above).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 13960/06

  A.R., SPOL. S R.O. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  The Court, therefore, considers that the applicants' right to an effective remedy has not been respected (see mutatis mutandis, A. R., spol. s r. o. v. Slovakia, no. 13960/06, §§ 59-60, 9 February 2010).

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  Such was also the case where a procedural situation or the state of the proceedings before a public authority objectively excluded the possibility that such an authority (ordinary court) violates the afore-mentioned fundamental right (IV. ÚS 16/04, II. ÚS 1/05, II. ÚS 20/05, IV. ÚS 55/05, IV. ÚS 288/05).
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01, 60226/00, 22 October 2002).
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 11/04

  VOTTO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  11/04/2011.
• RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

  Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  Such was also the case where a procedural situation or the state of the proceedings before a public authority objectively excluded the possibility that such an authority (ordinary court) violates the afore-mentioned fundamental right (IV. ÚS 16/04, II. ÚS 1/05, II. ÚS 20/05, IV. ÚS 55/05, IV. ÚS 288/05).
• EGMR, 14.10.2003 - 66142/01

  CIZ v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  The Court first reiterates that, in respect of the alleged violation of the applicants' right to a hearing within a reasonable time, it is irrelevant that the applicants withdrew their claim and that, as a result, the ordinary court did not ultimately determine the merits of the case (see Cíz v. Slovakia, no. 66142/01, § 61, 14 October 2003).
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 1/05

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  Such was also the case where a procedural situation or the state of the proceedings before a public authority objectively excluded the possibility that such an authority (ordinary court) violates the afore-mentioned fundamental right (IV. ÚS 16/04, II. ÚS 1/05, II. ÚS 20/05, IV. ÚS 55/05, IV. ÚS 288/05).
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 16970/05

  MAZUREK v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25657/08

  They reiterated the reasoning of the Constitutional Court's decision and considered the latter to be in accordance with the Court's case-law (see Mazurek v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 16970/05, 3 March 2009).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 2015/02

  JAKUB ET 109 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE SLOVAQUE

  25657/08.