Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ORDUKHANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ORDUKHANOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  As regards the applicant's complaint relating to the length of proceedings, the Court notes that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 19, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ramiz Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 40424/12, § 55, 16 June 2022).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  The Court considers that the applicant's complaint should be examined solely under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  As regards the applicant's complaint relating to the length of proceedings, the Court notes that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 19, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ramiz Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 40424/12, § 55, 16 June 2022).

• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 66249/16

  ZULFIYA ALIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  Accordingly, it is not appropriate to take up this matter in the context of the present case (see Aliyeva and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 66249/16 and 6 others, §§ 94-96, 21 September 2021).
• EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 64480/09

  LULI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  As to the applicant's conduct, the Court notes that applicants are entitled to make use of all relevant domestic procedural steps, as the applicant did in the present case, but they should do so with diligence and must bear the consequences when such procedural applications result in delay (see Luli and Others v. Albania, nos. 64480/09 and 5 others, § 90, 1 April 2014).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 46371/18

  OMDAHL v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  Moreover, in the present case a number of legal disputes concerning a variety of legal issues were resolved by way of separate sets of proceedings, including a dispute relating to the division of an estate (see Omdahl v. Norway, no. 46371/18, § 54, 22 April 2021).
• EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 40424/12

  JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 27741/13

  As regards the applicant's complaint relating to the length of proceedings, the Court notes that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 19, ECHR 2000-IV; and Ramiz Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 40424/12, § 55, 16 June 2022).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen