Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KADULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KADULIN v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 72051/17

  KORNEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17,.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.

  Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 50271/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 5865/07

  BUTKEVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018).

  Delay of more than a few hours in releasing the applicant (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018).

  Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08

  TSVETKOVA v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018, the Court has already found a violation in respect of the issues similar to those in the present case.

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019), Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018).

  Detention as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment of "exceptional circumstances" under Art. 27.3 § 1 CAO (see Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-64, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018), Detention as an administrative suspect: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019).

• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 7077/06

  FORTALNOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  7077/06 and 12 others, 26 June 2018, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, § 67, 13 February 2018, Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019, and Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos.

  7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018).

• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05

  GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  11/05/2016.

  11/05/2016.

• KAG Mainz, 03.11.2011 - M 17/11

  Beteiligung bei Versetzung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Syktyvkar, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 25, 000, final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/11/2021;.
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  10/09/2021.
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 10/10

  BRUNNER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  10/10/2018.
• KAGH, 05.07.2013 - K 24/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 3001/18

  24/12/2021.
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 47598/08

  TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA
• RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

  Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

  KARELIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12

  Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo
• EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 60921/17

  DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13764/15

  MARTYNYUK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2014 - 1253/04

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VG München, 30.03.2023 - M 19 S 23.50135

  Dublin-Verfahren (Litauen)

  Verwiesen wird auf dementsprechende verwaltungsgerichtliche Rechtsprechung, die in Abdrucken dem Gericht vorgelegt wird (VG Weimar, B.v. 25.1.2023 - 7 E 2546/22; VG Hamburg, B.v. 17.1.2023 - 9 AE 5235/22; VG Hannover, B.v. 1.11.2022 - 3 B 4452/22; VG Göttingen, B.v. 21.10.2022 - 2 B 216/22; VG Berlin, B.v. 7.10.2022 - VG 22 L 258/22 A; VG Magdeburg, B.v. 6.9.2022 - 3 B 233/22 MD; insbes.

  Rn. 25 Diesbezüglich wird auf die überwiegende verwaltungsgerichtliche Rechtsprechung verwiesen, die aufgrund der derzeitigen Situation in Bezug auf Litauen davon ausgeht, dass eine Rücküberstellung aktuell nicht in Betracht kommt und der sich das entscheidende Gericht anschließt (VG Weimar, B.v. 25.1.2023 - 7 E 2546/22 - n.v.; VG Berlin, B.v. 25.1.2023 - 31 L 297/22 - juris S. 4 ff.;… VG Minden, B.v. 17.1.2023 - 12 L 956/22.A - juris Rn. 36 m.w.N.; VG Hamburg, B.v. 17.1.2023 - 9 AE 5235/22 - n.v.;… VG Hannover, B.v. 25.8.2022 - 12 B 6475/21 - juris Rn. 11;… VG Chemnitz, B.v. 24.10.2022 - 1 L 352/22.A - juris Rn. 11; VG Göttingen, B.v. 21.10.2022 - 2 B 216/22 - n.v. S. 4 ff.;… VG Magdeburg, B.v. 5.9.2022 - 3 B 262/22 MD - juris Rn. 11, 15 f.;… VG München, B.v. 17.6.2022 - M 10 S 22.50244 - juris Rn. 22;… Anschluss an VG Hannover, B.v. 23.2.2022 - 12 B 6475.21 - juris Rn. 9 ff.;… a.A. VG Freiburg, U.v. 17.1.2023 - A 13 K 1760/22 - juris Rn. 29 ff.;… VG Greifswald, B.v. 27.10.2022 - 6 B 1625/22 HGW - juris Rn. 8; Anschluss an VG Regensburg, B.v. 27.6.2022 - RN 14 S 22.50203 - juris OS).