Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PECENKO v. SLOVENIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PECENKO v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.06.2001 - 63226/00

  CRAXI III contre l'ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 39485/14

  In these circumstances, where failure to respect procedural rules constitutes the reason for the refusal of a remedy, the Court cannot consider that the requirement as to the exhaustion of domestic remedies has been satisfied (see, amongst many other authorities, Craxi v. Italy (dec.), no. 63226/00, 14 June 2001, with further references).
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 39485/14

  The Court reiterates its established case-law to the effect that all complaints intended to be made at international level should have been aired before the appropriate domestic courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III).
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 14717/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 39485/14

  A more detailed account of the provisions of the 1991 Housing Act is contained in Berger-Krall and Others v. Slovenia (no. 14717/04, §§ 18-23, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 55782/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.03.2018 - 39485/14

  In light of the applicable legal provisions, and bearing in mind that it is primarily for the national authorities to interpret and apply domestic law, especially rules of a procedural nature, such as time-limits for filing documents or for lodging appeals (see, mutatis mutandis, Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII), the Court finds that the time-limit requirements for requesting participation in the denationalisation proceedings were applied in a reasonable and foreseeable manner in the applicant's case.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 15016/07

  SCHRADE v. GEORGIA

  His complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 must accordingly be declared inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Pečenko v. Slovenia (dec.) [Committee], no. 39485/14, § 47, 6 March 2018).