Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  OFFICE OF ASSOCIATED PUBLIC NOTARIES 'ETICA' v. ROMANIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 56080/13

  LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 43190/10

  The Court considers that the preliminary objection raised by the Government is so closely linked to the substance of the applicant organisation's complaint that it must be joined to the merits (see, for example, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 142, ECHR 2017).
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 43190/10

  The Court can accept that certain urgent circumstances may require that particular measures may be taken by the investigating authorities without any prior authorisation in order to ensure the proper investigation of a criminal case (see, mutatis mutandis, Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, §§ 221-222, ECHR 2013).
• EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 24117/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 43190/10

  The relevant principles concerning the scope of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of circumstances involving the presence of State authorities on the premises of an organisation or company and the seizure of documents and data are set out in Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway (no. 24117/08, § 104, 14 March 2013).
• EGMR, 18.09.2015 - 42219/07

  GHERGHINA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 43190/10

  The Court reiterates the general principles concerning the exhaustion of domestic remedies summarised in the case of Gherghina v. Romania ([GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, §§ 83-89, 9 July 2015).
• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 50882/99

  PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 43190/10

  In the absence of such a complaint, the Court does not find it necessary to determine whether there has been an interference with "private life" in the instant case (see, mutatis mutandis, Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, § 72, 27 September 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen