Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SIMONOV v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 45255/07

  The Court recalls that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention were stated in a number of its previous judgements (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

  CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 45255/07

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of pre-trial detention (tymczasowe aresztowanie), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other, so-called "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are stated in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006 and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 May 2006.
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

  BAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 45255/07

  Further, in the Court's view, the fact that the case concerned a member of a criminal group should be taken into account in assessing compliance with Article 5 § 3 (see Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, § 57, 16 January 2007).
• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 28904/02

  GORSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 45255/07

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that the existence of a general risk flowing from the organised nature of the alleged criminal activities of the applicant may be accepted as the basis for his detention at the initial stages of the proceedings (see Górski v. Poland, no. 28904/02, § 58, 4 October 2005) and in some circumstances also for subsequent extensions of the detention (see Celejewski, cited above, § 37).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 62663/13

  SCENSNOVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  The Government furthermore argued that in cases concerning serious criminal acts the Court had found no violation of Article 5 § 3 when detention on remand had lasted over three years (see Wrona v. Poland, no. 23119/05, 5 January 2010; Simonov v. Poland [Committee], no. 45255/07, 17 April 2012; Luković v. Serbia, no. 43808/07, 26 March 2013; Mierzejewski v. Poland, no. 15612/13, 24 February 2015; and Gawrecki v. Poland [Committee], no. 56713/09, 14 April 2015).