Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAZMINA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award and State to secure enforcement of judgment debt Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  The Court further recalls that the domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 158, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  The Court further reiterates that a "claim" can constitute a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 if it is sufficiently established to be enforceable, for example by way of a final judicial decision (see Burdov v. Russia, cited above, § 40, and Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, p. 84, § 59).

• BPatG, 17.11.2011 - 3 ZA (pat) 54/11

  Patentnichtigkeitsklageverfahren - mehrere Gerichtsgebühren bei nachträglicher …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  15/09/2006.
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was accessible, was one which was capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 43883/02

  PLOTNIKOVY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 72374/01

  The Court considers that in the present case it could not be said to have constituted an effective remedy against non-enforcement (see Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 17, 24 February 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00

  TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

  72374/01.

  72374/01.

• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 8355/07

  YEVDOKIYA KUZNETSOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court considers that in the present case such complaint cannot be said to have constituted an effective remedy against non-enforcement (see Plotnikovy v. Russia, no. 43883/02, § 17, 24 February 2005, Kazmina v. Russia, no. 72374/01, § 23, 15 June 2006).