Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FIGAS v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  As from that date he was detained "after conviction by a competent court", within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (a) and, consequently, that period of his detention falls outside the scope of Article 5 § 3 (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 45219/06

  KAUCZOR v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  The relevant statistical data, recent amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure designed to streamline criminal proceedings and references to the relevant Council of Europe Documents can be found in the Court's judgment in the case of Kauczor (see Kauczor v. Poland, no. 45219/06, §§ 27-28 and 30-35, 3 February 2009).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

  CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  A detailed description of the relevant domestic law and judicial practice concerning the imposition of pre-trial detention, the grounds for its extension, release from detention and rules governing other "preventive measures" is given in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006, and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.

• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 47414/99

  SZOTT-MEDYNSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  In any event, the Court reiterates that it has already dealt with the question of the effectiveness of the constitutional complaint in Poland (see Szott-Medynska v. Poland (dec.), no. 47414/99, 9 October 2003; and subsequently Pachla v. Poland (dec.), no. 8812/02, 8 November 2005; Wiecek v. Poland (dec.), no. 19795/02, 17 January 2006; and Tereba v. Poland (dec.), no. 30263/04, 21 November 2006).
• EGMR, 21.11.2006 - 30263/04

  TEREBA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  In any event, the Court reiterates that it has already dealt with the question of the effectiveness of the constitutional complaint in Poland (see Szott-Medynska v. Poland (dec.), no. 47414/99, 9 October 2003; and subsequently Pachla v. Poland (dec.), no. 8812/02, 8 November 2005; Wiecek v. Poland (dec.), no. 19795/02, 17 January 2006; and Tereba v. Poland (dec.), no. 30263/04, 21 November 2006).
• EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 19795/02

  WIACEK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 7883/07

  In any event, the Court reiterates that it has already dealt with the question of the effectiveness of the constitutional complaint in Poland (see Szott-Medynska v. Poland (dec.), no. 47414/99, 9 October 2003; and subsequently Pachla v. Poland (dec.), no. 8812/02, 8 November 2005; Wiecek v. Poland (dec.), no. 19795/02, 17 January 2006; and Tereba v. Poland (dec.), no. 30263/04, 21 November 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 8456/08

  ZURAWSKI v. POLAND

  In that respect they raised the same arguments as those submitted in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, § 31, 23 June 2009, not final).

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, cited above, §§ 41-44).

• EGMR, 04.12.2014 - 25792/94

  TRZASKA AND 172 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND

  7883/07.
• EGMR, 20.04.2010 - 38018/07

  KRZYSZTOFIAK v. POLAND

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).

• EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 24205/06

  [ENG]

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 28993/05

  LEWICKI v. POLAND

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 42146/07

  POLANSKI v. POLAND

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 14148/05

  GOLISZEWSKI v. POLAND

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 30028/06

  PIOTR OSUCH v. POLAND

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 33004/07

  [ENG]

  The Government referred to the arguments submitted previously in the case of Figas v. Poland (no. 7883/07, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2009).
• EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 43610/06

  WISNIEWSKI v. POLAND

  The Government submitted that the applicant had not exhausted all the remedies afforded by Polish law in that he had failed to lodge a constitutional complaint under Article 79 § 1 of the Constitution questioning the constitutionality of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Proceedings that had served as a basis to extend his pre-trial detention, in particular Article 263. In that respect they raised the same arguments, as those submitted in the case of Figas (Figas v. Poland, no. 7883/07, § 31, 23 June 2009, not final).
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 17888/07

  JASARI v. POLAND