Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KÜLEKCI v. AUSTRIA

  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KÜLEKCI v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KÜLEKCI v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 02.08.2001 - 54273/00

  BOULTIF v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30441/09

  Referring to the Court's judgments in the cases Boultif v. Switzerland (no. 54273/00, ECHR 2001-IX), Üner v. the Netherlands ([GC] no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006-XII) and Maslov v. Austria ([GC] no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008), it found that - in contrast to Maslov - the applicant had repeatedly committed serious crimes of a violent nature.
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86

  MOUSTAQUIM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30441/09

  For instance, when assessing the nature and seriousness of the offences committed by an applicant, it has to be taken into account whether he or she committed them as a juvenile or as an adult (see, for instance, Moustaquim v. Belgium, 18 February 1991, § 44, Series A no. 193, and Radovanovic v. Austria, no. 42703/98, § 35, 22 April 2004).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84

  BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30441/09

  In their assessment of the proportionality of the interference, the national authorities enjoy a certain margin of appreciation (Berrehab v. the Netherlands, 21 June 1988, § 28, Series A no. 138).

• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 16588/20

  AHMED v. DENMARK

  As noted, however (see, inter alia, Külekci v. Austria, no. 30441/09, § 45, 1 June 2017) the applicant's criminal offence leading to the expulsion order was of such a serious and violent nature that it could not be regarded as a mere act of juvenile delinquency.
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 17803/20

  MAVRIC v. DENMARK

  The Court notes in this context that the duration of a ban on re-entry, in particular the fact that such a ban is limited, is an element to which it has attached importance in its case-law (see, for example, Külekci v. Austria, 30441/09, § 51, 1 June 2017, and Khan, cited above, § 79).
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 20579/20

  ABDULJI v. DENMARK

  The Court notes in this context that the duration of a ban on re-entry, in particular the fact that such a ban is limited, is an element to which it has attached importance in its case-law (see, for example, Külekci v. Austria, 30441/09, § 51, 1 June 2017 and Khan v. Denmark, cited above, § 79).