Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09, 47008/16, 62972/16, 60840/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.09.2020 - 30050/09, 47008/16, 62972/16, 60840/19 (https://dejure.org/2020,24711)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. September 2020 - 30050/09, 47008/16, 62972/16, 60840/19 (https://dejure.org/2020,24711)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,24711) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHISHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SHISHKIN v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324). - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 30873/96
EGMEZ c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
He had an "arguable claim" that obliged the domestic authorities to carry out "a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible" (see, for similar reasoning, Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 66, ECHR 2000-XII, and Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, §§ 358-59, 6 April 2004). - EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 8810/05
DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
It was therefore incumbent on the national authorities to respond to the applicant's claim, which was clearly credible, without undue delay and to provide a plausible explanation for his injuries (see A.A. v. Russia, no. 49097/08, § 92, 17 January 2012, and Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 109, 30 May 2013).
- EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 21689/93
AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
He had an "arguable claim" that obliged the domestic authorities to carry out "a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible" (see, for similar reasoning, Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 66, ECHR 2000-XII, and Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, §§ 358-59, 6 April 2004). - EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 8461/03
MOGILAT v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
The Court considers that such delay put into question the experts" ability to provide adequate answers to the questions raised by the investigating authority (see Mogilat v. Russia, no. 8461/03, § 64, 13 March 2012). - EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 49097/08
A.A. v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 30050/09
It was therefore incumbent on the national authorities to respond to the applicant's claim, which was clearly credible, without undue delay and to provide a plausible explanation for his injuries (see A.A. v. Russia, no. 49097/08, § 92, 17 January 2012, and Davitidze v. Russia, no. 8810/05, § 109, 30 May 2013).
- EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 34720/16
KVIRIKASHVILI v. GEORGIA
They did not explain the origin of this injury, limiting the scope of the investigation to the examination of a single blow inflicted on the applicant before the arrest (compare Shishkin and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 30050/09, §§ 92-97, 1 September 2020; see also Minin and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 29120/06 and 8 others, § 146, 27 July 2021; see also Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 256 and 266, 26 April 2011).