Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 18792/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,61111) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 18792/03
- EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 18792/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 18792/03
In so far as the applicant complains about the non-attendance of the victim, the Court reiterates that while Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is therefore primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, §§ 45 and 46). - EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9120/80
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 18792/03
In so far as the applicant complains that the testimonies of the witness and a victim were read out, it should be noted that the admission of such evidence without an opportunity to cross-examine may render the trial unfair in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention if the conviction is based wholly or mainly on such evidence (see Unterpertinger v. Austria, judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 110, §§ 28-33). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 18792/03
The Court reiterates that it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them as well as the relevance of the evidence which defendant seeks to adduce (see Vidal v. Belgium, judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33).