Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOMISSAROV v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Violation of Article 5 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOMISSAROV v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 46390/10

  AUAD v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 20611/17

  Furthermore, the Court has, in a number of cases, unequivocally held that fixed time-limits are not a requirement of Article 5 § 1(f), and that it will deal with each complaint on a case-by-case basis in order to decide if detention has become unlawful (see A.H. and J.K. v. Cyprus, nos. 41903/10 and 41911/10, § 190, 21 July 2015; Amie and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 58149/08, § 72, 12 February 2013; Auad v. Bulgaria, no. 46390/10, § 128, 11 October 2011; and Bordovskiy v. Russia, no. 49491/99, § 50, 8 February 2005).

  In and of themselves they are neither necessary nor sufficient to ensure compliance with the requirements of Article 5 § 1(f) of the Convention (see, for example, Gallardo Sanchez, cited above, § 39, and Auad v. Bulgaria, no. 46390/10, § 131, 11 October 2011, § 131, in which the Court made it clear that even if fixed time-limits were complied with, it would still find an applicant's detention to be in breach of Article 5 § 1(f) if deportation was not pursued with due diligence).

• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 56660/12

  KORNEYKOVA AND KORNEYKOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 20611/17

  The Court considers, therefore, that it is not appropriate now to examine these new complaints within the context of the present application (see, for example, Korneykova and Korneykov v. Ukraine, no. 56660/12, §§ 95-96, 24 March 2016).
• EGMR, 10.12.2020 - 56751/16

  SHIKSAITOV v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 20611/17

  The Court's consideration 45. The general principles concerning detention pending deportation or extradition under Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention are set out in Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC] (no. 16483/12, §§ 88-92, 15 December 2016) and Shiksaitov v. Slovakia (nos. 56751/16 and 33762/17, §§ 53-56, 10 December 2020).
• RG, 03.11.1911 - V 665/11

  1. Stellt die Verwendung eines Gebrauchsgegenstandes ohne eine Veränderung von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 20611/17

  It also follows from the Constitutional Court's practice (see, for example, opinion of the plenary formation Pl. ÚS - st. 37/13 of 13 August 2013, judgments no. III. ÚS 665/11 of 10 September 2013 and no. I. ÚS 2211/13 of 18 June 2014) that extradition cannot be carried out before the asylum proceedings have ended.

• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 19124/21

  MATTHEWS AND JOHNSON v. ROMANIA

  The Court has considered that factors relevant to the assessment of the "quality of law" - which are referred to in some cases as "safeguards against arbitrariness" - will include the existence of clear legal provisions for ordering detention, for extending detention, and for setting time-limits for detention; and the existence of an effective remedy by which the applicant can contest the "lawfulness" and "length" of his continued detention (see J.N. v. the United Kingdom, no. 37289/12, § 77 in fine, 19 May 2016, and Komissarov v. the Czech Republic, no. 20611/17, § 47, 3 February 2022).
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 20183/21

  LAZAR v. ROMANIA

  The Court has considered that factors relevant to the assessment of the "quality of law" - which are referred to in some cases as "safeguards against arbitrariness" - will include the existence of clear legal provisions for ordering detention, for extending detention, and for setting time-limits for detention; and the existence of an effective remedy by which the applicant can contest the "lawfulness" and "length" of his continued detention (see J.N. v. the United Kingdom, no. 37289/12, § 77 in fine, 19 May 2016, and Komissarov v. the Czech Republic, no. 20611/17, § 47, 3 February 2022).
• EGMR, 18.04.2023 - 43966/19

  N.M. c. BELGIQUE

  Elle aura pour cela égard à l'ensemble des procédures qui ont pu impacter la durée de la détention (voir, parmi d'autres, K.G., précité, §§ 82-87, E.K. c. Grèce, no 73700/13, § 97, 14 janvier 2021, et Komissarov c. République tchèque, no 20611/17, §§ 49-53, 3 février 2022).
• EGMR - 49068/20 (anhängig)

  BAYRAMALIYEV v. TÜRKIYE

  56751/16 and 33762/17, §§ 53-56, 10 December 2020; and Komissarov v. the Czech Republic, no. 20611/17, §§ 45-53, 3 February 2022)?.