Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05, 17126/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,66207
EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05, 17126/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,66207)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03.09.2009 - 17124/05, 17126/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,66207)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 03. September 2009 - 17124/05, 17126/05 (https://dejure.org/2009,66207)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66207) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

    WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05
    It is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply the domestic law, even in those fields where the Convention "incorporates" the rules of that law since the national authorities are, in the nature of things, particularly qualified to settle the issues arising in this connection (see, mutatis mutandis, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 46, Series A no. 33).
  • EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

    PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05
    In particular, there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised by any measure depriving a person of his or her possessions (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 38, Series A no. 332; and Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-XII).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 17373/02

    ROSINSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05
    Despite the margin of appreciation given to the State the Court must nevertheless, in the exercise of its power of review, determine whether the requisite balance was maintained in a manner consonant with the applicants" right to property (see Rosinski v. Poland, no. 17373/02, § 78, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 43447/98

    SORIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05
    In the Strunjak case (Strunjak and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 46934/99, ECHR 2000-X; see also Soric v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43447/98, 16 March 2000) the Court described the protection afforded to protected lessees under the Lease of Flats Act as quite broad.
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 46934/99

    STRUNJAK ET AUTRES c. CROATIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 17124/05
    In the Strunjak case (Strunjak and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 46934/99, ECHR 2000-X; see also Soric v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43447/98, 16 March 2000) the Court described the protection afforded to protected lessees under the Lease of Flats Act as quite broad.
  • EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 12027/10

    STATILEO v. CROATIA

    It is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law, even in those fields where the Convention "incorporates" the rules of that law, since the national authorities are, in the nature of things, particularly qualified to settle the issues arising in this connection (see Pavlinovic and Tonic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 17124/05 and 17126/05, 3 September 2009).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 42574/13

    MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    17124/05 and 17126/05, 3 September 2009).
  • EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 69735/11

    VUKUSIC v. CROATIA

    17124/05 and 17126/05, 3 September 2009).
  • EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 23662/12

    VUKOVIC v. CROATIA

    It is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply domestic law, even in those fields where the Convention "incorporates" the rules of that law, since the national authorities are, in the nature of things, particularly qualified to settle the issues arising in this connection (see Pavlinovic and Tonic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 17124/05 and 17126/05, 3 September 2009).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht