Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TUNCER GÜNES v. TURKEY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 14+8-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life Article 8-1 - Respect for family life Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Tuncer Günes v. Turkey

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 26268/08

  In response to the Government's argument concerning the costs and expenses relating to the proceedings at the national level, the Court reiterates that, if it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 56, ECHR 2002-III).

• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 11736/09

  YAVUZ NAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Referring to the Court's judgments in the cases of Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey (no. 29865/96, ECHR 2004-X (extracts)), Leventoglu Abdulkadiroglu v. Turkey (no. 7971/07, 28 May 2013), Tuncer Günes v. Turkey (no. 26268/08, 3 September 2013) and Tanbay Tüten v. Turkey (no. 38249/09, 10 December 2013), the Constitutional Court held that Article 187 of the Civil Code was in contradiction with the Convention.
• EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 22079/13

  YURDAKUL ENGIN v. TURKEY

  Referring to the Court's judgments in the cases of Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey (no. 29865/96, ECHR 2004-X (extracts)); Leventoglu Abdulkadiroglu v. Turkey (no. 7971/07, 28 May 2013); Tuncer Günes v. Turkey (no. 26268/08, 3 September 2013); and Tanbay Tüten v. Turkey (no. 38249/09, 10 December 2013), the Constitutional Court held that Article 187 of the Civil Code was in contradiction with the Convention.