Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 47166/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,18390) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SVITLANA ILCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Overall ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ILCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 47166/09
It is true that the States" margin of appreciation in town-planning policy is wide (see, for example, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 69, Series A no. 52). - EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 36184/13
KRISTIANA LTD. v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 47166/09
In particular, there is no indication that such particularly strong interests as protection of the environment (see, for example, Depalle, cited above, § 84, and Kristiana Ltd. v. Lithuania, no. 36184/13, § 107, 6 February 2018), the need to uphold the rule of law and prohibition on illegal construction (see, for example, Saliba and Others v. Malta, no. 20287/10, § 44, 22 November 2011) or considerations of social justice (see, for example, Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99 and 2 others, § 117, ECHR 2005-VI) drove the authorities" decisions. - EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 35179/97
ALLARD c. SUEDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 47166/09
The Court considers that, in the present case, the applicable rule is the one concerning the deprivation of property (see Allard v. Sweden, no. 35179/97, § 50, ECHR 2003-VII, and N.A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 37451/97, §§ 31 and 38, ECHR 2005-X).
- EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12
KOSTOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
The Court reiterates that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited, and that it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply such law (see Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 82, ECHR 2000-XII, and Svitlana Ilchenko v. Ukraine, no. 47166/09, § 66, 4 July 2019).