Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 23410/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57113) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STELIOS SCHINAS-SPILIOS KAISARIS KOINOPRAXIA v. GREECE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 23410/09
In particular, it is not the Court's function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see, among many others, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 23410/09
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 9939/02
PEKINEL v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 23410/09
The domestic courts are best placed for assessing the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case and for interpreting and applying rules of substantive and procedural law (see Pekinel v. Turkey, no. 9939/02, § 53, 18 March 2008).