Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35221/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,37959) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
O.N. v. BULGARIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 24.11.1986 - 9063/80
GILLOW v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35221/97
Furthermore, it is common in the Convention countries that higher courts deal with similar or related cases in turn (see the Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 40 § 97; the Gillow v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, p. 28 § 73; appl. no. 15975/90, Dec. 1.7.91, DR 71, p. 245). - EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65
RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35221/97
Furthermore, it is common in the Convention countries that higher courts deal with similar or related cases in turn (see the Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 40 § 97; the Gillow v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, p. 28 § 73; appl. no. 15975/90, Dec. 1.7.91, DR 71, p. 245). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35221/97
A claim of this nature constitutes an asset and therefore amounts to "a possession" within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. This provision is accordingly applicable in the present case (see the Pressoss Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31).
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 66209/10
HUNGUEST ZRT v. HUNGARY
This is so because - although there is no obligation under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to apply an inflation-proofed default interest rate to private claims (see O.N. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 35221/97, 6 April 2000; and Grozeva v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52788/99, 3 November 2005) - national law often provides for default interest payable to a successful plaintiff, whose amount will increase with time. - EGMR, 29.09.2020 - 23155/10
BUZURTANOV ET KOTIYEV c. RUSSIE
La Convention ne saurait être entendue comme une obligation pour les États de mener une politique économique donnée en vue de minimiser les effets de l'inflation (O.N. c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 35221/97, 6 avril 2000 et, plus récemment, Nachkebiya c Russie, [comité], no 6351/13, 12 mai 2020, et Vinogradov c. Russie, [comité], no 50053/06, 2 juin 2020).