Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SVARPSTONS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR - 45886/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 14976/05

  Where it is clear from the outset, however, that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that act or its effect on or prejudice to the applicant (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 259, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 14976/05

  The Court recalls that Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see, among other authorities, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 07.12.2004 - 71074/01

  MENTZEN c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 14976/05

  Article 96 enshrines the right to respect for private life, home and correspondence (see Mentzen v. Latvia (dec.), no. 71074/01, ECHR 2004-XII).

• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 225/20

  DZIBUTI AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

  As regards the first, second and third applicants, the Government emphasised that the Constitutional Court had refused to institute proceedings in relation to the compatibility of the impugned provision with Article 110 of the Constitution (the right to family life) because the applicants had failed to provide legal reasoning (they referred to section 20(5)(3) of the Law on the Constitutional Court, Gubenko v. Latvia (dec.), no. 6674/06, 3 November 2015, and Svarpstons and Others v. Latvia (dec.), no. 14976/05, 6 December 2016).
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 8430/16

  JURGILEVICA AND POLAKOVS v. LATVIA

  Where the application is rejected for failure to comply with the Constitutional Court's admissibility criteria, the Court will consider that the applicant has not exhausted the available domestic remedies (see Gubenko v. Latvia (dec.), no. 6674/06, §§ 9 and 25, 3 November 2015, and Svarpstons and Others v. Latvia (dec.), no. 14976/05, §§ 26 and 51, 6 December 2016).
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 24827/16

  LIEPINS v. LATVIA

  Where the application is rejected for failure to comply with the admissibility criteria before the Constitutional Court, the Court will consider that the applicant has not exhausted the available domestic remedies (see Gubenko, cited above §§ 9 and 25, and Svarpstons and Others v. Latvia (dec.), no. 14976/05, §§ 26 and 51, 6 December 2016).