Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  For relevant provisions of domestic law see Koryak v. Russia (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013).
• EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 56027/10

  RESHETNYAK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  For relevant provisions of domestic law see Koryak v. Russia (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 24677/10

  KORYAK v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  For relevant provisions of domestic law see Koryak v. Russia (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012); Dirdizov v. Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Reshetnyak v. Russia (no. 56027/10, §§ 35-46, 8 January 2013).

 
• EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 7078/02

  V.D. c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  The Government did not provide any explanation in that respect (see, mutatis mutandis, V.D. v. Romania, no. 7078/02, §§ 94-99, 16 February 2010).
• EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 12983/14

  PATRANIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  For the relevant provisions of domestic law, including joint Decree no. 640/190 of the Ministry of Health and Social Development and the Ministry of Justice on the Organisation of Medical Assistance to Individuals Serving Sentences or Remanded in Custody ("the Regulation"), enacted on 17 October 2005, and international reports and documents see Patranin v. Russia (no. 12983/14, §§ 33-40, 23 July 2015).
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 1439/06

  A.B. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 66231/14

  Lastly, the Court has found that such a remedy did not offer reasonable prospects of success, in particular because the award was conditional on the establishment of fault on the part of the authorities, which was extremely improbable in a situation where domestic legal norms prescribed the application of a certain measure, for instance certain conditions of detention or a certain level of medical treatment (see A.B. v. Russia, no. 1439/06, § 96, 14 October 2010).