Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,63238) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PETKOSKI AND OTHERS v. \
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Struck out of the list (death) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03
- EGMR, 14.02.2018 - 27736/03
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87
RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03
In addition, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of the dispute (see Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 49). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03
However, being able to put a case to a court does not in itself satisfy all the requirements of Article 6 § 1. It must also be established that the degree of access afforded under the national legislation was sufficient to secure the individual's "right to a court", having regard to the rule of law in a democratic society (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25, § 57). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03
The Court recalls that "the procedural guarantees laid down in Article 6 secure to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal; in this way it embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect" (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36).
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 25248/05
NAUMOSKI v.
Accordingly, the Court makes no award in this respect (see Petkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27736/03, § 56, 8 January 2009).