Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CASINI v. ITALY

  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

  SULWINSKA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; see also WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwi?„ska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).
• EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 10557/03

  GIGLI COSTRUZIONI S.R.L. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the calculation of expropriation compensation pursuant to section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 as well as the violation of Article 6 § 1 in connection with the application of the latter legislation in the course of the domestic proceedings (see, amongst others, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Gigli Costruzioni S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 10557/03, 1 April 2008; Pisacane and Others v. Italy, no. 70573/01, 27 May 2008; Sarnelli v. Italy, no. 37637/05, 17 July 2008; Mandola v. Italy, no. 38596/02, 30 June 2009; Perinati v. Italy, no. 8073/05, 6 October 2009; Vacca v. Italy, no. 8061/05, 8 December 2009; and Zuccalà v. Italy, no. 72746/01, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 38596/02

  MANDOLA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the calculation of expropriation compensation pursuant to section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 as well as the violation of Article 6 § 1 in connection with the application of the latter legislation in the course of the domestic proceedings (see, amongst others, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Gigli Costruzioni S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 10557/03, 1 April 2008; Pisacane and Others v. Italy, no. 70573/01, 27 May 2008; Sarnelli v. Italy, no. 37637/05, 17 July 2008; Mandola v. Italy, no. 38596/02, 30 June 2009; Perinati v. Italy, no. 8073/05, 6 October 2009; Vacca v. Italy, no. 8061/05, 8 December 2009; and Zuccalà v. Italy, no. 72746/01, 19 January 2010).

 
• EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 72746/01

  ZUCCALA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the calculation of expropriation compensation pursuant to section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 as well as the violation of Article 6 § 1 in connection with the application of the latter legislation in the course of the domestic proceedings (see, amongst others, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Gigli Costruzioni S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 10557/03, 1 April 2008; Pisacane and Others v. Italy, no. 70573/01, 27 May 2008; Sarnelli v. Italy, no. 37637/05, 17 July 2008; Mandola v. Italy, no. 38596/02, 30 June 2009; Perinati v. Italy, no. 8073/05, 6 October 2009; Vacca v. Italy, no. 8061/05, 8 December 2009; and Zuccalà v. Italy, no. 72746/01, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 8061/05

  VACCA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the calculation of expropriation compensation pursuant to section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 as well as the violation of Article 6 § 1 in connection with the application of the latter legislation in the course of the domestic proceedings (see, amongst others, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Gigli Costruzioni S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 10557/03, 1 April 2008; Pisacane and Others v. Italy, no. 70573/01, 27 May 2008; Sarnelli v. Italy, no. 37637/05, 17 July 2008; Mandola v. Italy, no. 38596/02, 30 June 2009; Perinati v. Italy, no. 8073/05, 6 October 2009; Vacca v. Italy, no. 8061/05, 8 December 2009; and Zuccalà v. Italy, no. 72746/01, 19 January 2010).
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 8073/05

  PERINATI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 47503/07

  The Court has established in a large number of cases against Italy its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the calculation of expropriation compensation pursuant to section 5 bis of Law no. 359 of 8 August 1992 as well as the violation of Article 6 § 1 in connection with the application of the latter legislation in the course of the domestic proceedings (see, amongst others, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006-V; Gigli Costruzioni S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 10557/03, 1 April 2008; Pisacane and Others v. Italy, no. 70573/01, 27 May 2008; Sarnelli v. Italy, no. 37637/05, 17 July 2008; Mandola v. Italy, no. 38596/02, 30 June 2009; Perinati v. Italy, no. 8073/05, 6 October 2009; Vacca v. Italy, no. 8061/05, 8 December 2009; and Zuccalà v. Italy, no. 72746/01, 19 January 2010).