Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55159) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SHULGIN v. UKRAINE
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Shulgin v. Ukraine
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
- EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 29912/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
Thus, flaws in the detention order do not necessarily render the underlying period of detention unlawful within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 68, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
According to the Court's case-law, detention following a conviction imposed in manifestly unfair proceedings amounting to a flagrant denial of justice is unlawful and automatically implies a breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Gruber, cited above; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova [GC], no. 48787/99, § 461, ECHR 2004-VII; and Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, §§ 51 and 58-59, 24 March 2005). - EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 9808/02
STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
According to the Court's case-law, detention following a conviction imposed in manifestly unfair proceedings amounting to a flagrant denial of justice is unlawful and automatically implies a breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Gruber, cited above; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova [GC], no. 48787/99, § 461, ECHR 2004-VII; and Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, §§ 51 and 58-59, 24 March 2005). - EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 45198/04
K.-H. G.gegen Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
Similarly, a conviction which has been imposed by judgment following a breach of substantive provisions of domestic law in the criminal proceedings does not automatically render the detention by virtue of that judgment unlawful (see Gruber v. Germany (dec.), no. 45198/04, 20 November 2007). - EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
BOZANO v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 29912/05
In such cases, a subsequent finding by the courts that there has been a failure to comply with domestic law may not necessarily retrospectively affect the validity, under domestic law, of any implementing measures taken in the meantime (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 55, Series A no. 111).