Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 44654/06, 32525/08, 35537/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Dezember 2011 - 44654/06, 32525/08, 35537/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,57189)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57189) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PETROV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Petrov and Others v. Ukraine
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 44654/06
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 44654/06
In this context, the Court reiterates that, since remittal is usually ordered because of errors committed by lower courts, the repetition of such orders within one set of proceedings discloses a serious deficiency in the judicial system (see, mutatis mutandis, Wierciszewska v. Poland, no. 41431/98, § 46, 25 November 2003). - EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 20496/04
TUSASHVILI v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 44654/06
The Court reiterates that special diligence is necessary in disputes relating to the applicant's principle source of income (see, mutatis mutandis, among other authorities, Ruotolo v. Italy, judgment of 27 February 1992, Series A no. 230-D, p. 39, § 17; Tusashvili v. Russia, no. 20496/04, § 25, 15 December 2005 and Golovko v. Ukraine, no. 39161/02, § 54-55, 1 February 2007). - EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 39161/02
GOLOVKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 44654/06
The Court reiterates that special diligence is necessary in disputes relating to the applicant's principle source of income (see, mutatis mutandis, among other authorities, Ruotolo v. Italy, judgment of 27 February 1992, Series A no. 230-D, p. 39, § 17; Tusashvili v. Russia, no. 20496/04, § 25, 15 December 2005 and Golovko v. Ukraine, no. 39161/02, § 54-55, 1 February 2007).