Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 58510/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,41051) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 58510/00
- EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 58510/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 58510/00
In order to comply with the rule, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see the Yasa v. Turkey judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2431, § 71; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 74-75, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 58510/00
As the Court has pointed out above, the requirement of exhaustion of domestic remedies must be applied "with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism"; it is sufficient that "the complaints intended to be made subsequently before the Convention organs" should have been raised at the national level "at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law" (see the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 26, § 72, and the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34). - EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 58510/00
As the Court has pointed out above, the requirement of exhaustion of domestic remedies must be applied "with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism"; it is sufficient that "the complaints intended to be made subsequently before the Convention organs" should have been raised at the national level "at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law" (see the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 26, § 72, and the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34).