Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SLÁDKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SLÁDKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 4938/16

  PRANJIC-M-LUKIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  The relevant principles regarding the minimum level of severity which ill-treatment must attain to fall within the scope of Article 3 are summarised in Bouyid v. Belgium ([GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 82-88 and 101, ECHR 2015, and the references cited therein, and also Castellani v. France, (no. 43207/16, §§ 53 and 66, 30 April 2020, and Pranjic-M-Lukic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 4938/16, § 73 and § 82, 2 June 2020).
• EGMR, 30.04.2020 - 43207/16

  CASTELLANI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  The relevant principles regarding the minimum level of severity which ill-treatment must attain to fall within the scope of Article 3 are summarised in Bouyid v. Belgium ([GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 82-88 and 101, ECHR 2015, and the references cited therein, and also Castellani v. France, (no. 43207/16, §§ 53 and 66, 30 April 2020, and Pranjic-M-Lukic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 4938/16, § 73 and § 82, 2 June 2020).

 
• EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 10633/15

  TADIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention requires the authorities to investigate allegations of ill-treatment when they are "arguable" and "raise a reasonable suspicion" (see Gök and Güler v. Turkey, no. 74307/01, § 38, 28 July 2009, and Tadic v. Croatia, no. 10633/15, § 67, 23 November 2017).
• EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 20649/18

  R.R. AND R.D. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  Proceedings that can only result in the award of compensation to be paid by the State, but not in the punishment of those responsible for the ill-treatment, cannot be considered to satisfy the procedural requirement of Article 3 in cases of wilful ill-treatment of persons who are within the control of agents of the State (see, for example, Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 227, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and R.R. and R.D. v. Slovakia, no. 20649/18, § 127, 1 September 2020).
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 33754/16

  PERKOV v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 15741/15

  The Court notes the Government's objection regarding the applicability of Article 3 under its substantive limb (see, for example, Perkov v. Croatia, no. 33754/16, §§ 31-32, 20 September 2022 - not yet final).

• EGMR - 28273/23 (anhängig)

  S.T. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  In particular, has there been any independent and thorough investigation by the General Inspectorate of Security Forces, given that that authority relied information and evidence provided by the police (see, mutatis mutandis, Sládková v. the Czech Republic, no. 15741/15, § 76, 10 November 2022? Can the medical expert opinions ordered by the police be considered as impartial and independent?.