Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 35890/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,59) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STARIKOV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-a - Information on nature and cause of accusation;Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Adequate time) (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 35890/17
The general principles concerning the right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the accused's right to prepare his or her defence have been summarized in Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, §§ 51-54, ECHR 1999-II, and Penev v. Bulgaria, no. 20494/04, §§ 33-44, 7 January 2010. - EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 35890/17
The Court further refers to its settled case-law to the effect that when an applicant has suffered an infringement of his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention, he should, as far as possible, be put in the position in which he would have been had the requirements of that provision not been disregarded, and that the most appropriate form of redress would, in principle, be the reopening of the proceedings, if requested (see, mutatis mutandis, Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210 in fine, ECHR 2005 IV, and Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 263, 13 July 2006).