Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VARNIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Varniene v. Lithuania

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 42916/04
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 42916/04

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 42916/04

  Since the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are "practical and effective", it has to be ascertained whether that situation amounted to a de facto expropriation, as was argued by the applicant (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 63, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79

  BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 42916/04

  The Court observes that according to its case-law, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, which in substance guarantees the right of property, comprises three distinct rules (see, in particular, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98): the first rule, set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph, is of a general nature and enunciates the principle of the peaceful enjoyment of property; the second rule, contained in the second sentence of the first paragraph, covers deprivation of possessions and subjects it to certain conditions; the third rule, stated in the second paragraph, recognises that the Contracting States are entitled, amongst other things, to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest.

• EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 679/11

  SOLOMUN v. CROATIA

  One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see, amongst many others, Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII, and Varniene v. Lithuania, no. 42916/04, § 37, 12 November 2013).