Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 39351/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,1020) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TANTILOVI v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99
RIABYKH c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 39351/05
The principle of legal certainty and respect for the res judicata effect of final judgments requires that no party should be entitled to seek review of a final and binding judgment merely for the purpose of obtaining a rehearing and a fresh determination of the case (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05
MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 39351/05
In addition, the Court has accepted that in situations such as that in the present case, involving a wide-reaching legislative scheme with a significant economic impact, the national authorities must have a wide margin of appreciation in selecting the measures to secure respect for property rights or to regulate ownership relations (see also Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 182, ECHR 2004-V; Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, nos. 30767/05 and 33800/06, §§ 171-72, 12 October 2010; and Sivova and Koleva, cited above, §§ 97-98).
- EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 50249/13
GURMA v. ALBANIA
It therefore did not contradict the ad personam aspect of the principle of respect for the res judicata effect of judgments (compare Podrugina and Yedinov. v. Russia (dec.), no. 39654/07, 17 February 2009; Tantilovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 39351/05, § 36, 13 January 2015; and Guri?£anu v. Moldova (dec.) [Committee], no. 75732/12, § 21, 8 November 2022). - EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 12486/12
DEGTYAR v. UKRAINE
Therefore, the applicant's complaint under Article 6 § 1 is unsubstantiated (compare Ilieva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17705/05, §§ 40-42, 3 February 2015, and, mutatis mutandis, Tantilovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 39351/05, §§ 35-38, 13 January 2015).