Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ROMENSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Romenskiy v. Russia

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 22875/02

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  Finally, the Court reiterates that proceedings, viewed as a whole, can be considered fair if any defects in the original trial are subsequently remedied by the appeal courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 39, Series A no. 247-B, and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86, Series A no. 86, with further reference to Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, §§ 38-40, Series A no. 49).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05

  HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  Finally, the Court has always stressed the importance of "national procedures for ensuring impartiality" which are directed, inter alia, "at removing any appearance of partiality and so serve to promote the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public" (see Meznaric v. Croatia, no. 71615/01, § 27, 15 July 2005, and Huseyn and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, § 162, 26 July 2011).
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  The Court may also employ an objective approach, that is, determine whether the judge offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in respect of his impartiality (see Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53, and Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 57067/00, § 69, ECHR 2003-XII).

 
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  Finally, the Court reiterates that proceedings, viewed as a whole, can be considered fair if any defects in the original trial are subsequently remedied by the appeal courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 39, Series A no. 247-B, and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86, Series A no. 86, with further reference to Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, §§ 38-40, Series A no. 49).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  The Court reiterates in this respect that domestic remedies must be "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 158, ECHR-XI).
• EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78

  Adolf ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  Finally, the Court reiterates that proceedings, viewed as a whole, can be considered fair if any defects in the original trial are subsequently remedied by the appeal courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 39, Series A no. 247-B, and De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 33, Series A no. 86, Series A no. 86, with further reference to Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, §§ 38-40, Series A no. 49).
• EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

  HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02

  The mere fact that a trial judge has already taken pre-trial decisions in the case, including decisions relating to detention, cannot in itself justify fears as to his impartiality; only special circumstances may warrant a different conclusion (see Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, § 51, Series A no. 154, and Sainte-Marie v. France, no. 12981/87, § 32, 16 December 1992).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.10.2016 - C-439/16

  Milev - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - …

  23 - Vgl. beispielsweise EGMR, 20. Dezember 2005, Jasi?"ski/Polen, CE:ECHR:2005:1220JUD003086596, § 55, 22. April 2010, Chesne/Frankreich, CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD002980806, § 36, und 13. Juni 2013, Romenskiy/Russland, CE:ECHR:2013:0613JUD002287502, § 27.

  Vgl. EGMR, 13. Juni 2013, Romenskiy/Russland, CE:ECHR:2013:0613JUD002287502, § 31.