Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.09.2022 - 15758/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,23913) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TIMUR SHARIPOV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SHARIPOV v. RUSSIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2022 - 15758/13
It has also recognised that non-governmental organisations, academic researchers, authors of literature, bloggers and popular users of social media who draw attention to matters of public interest exercise the same function as a "public watchdog" and enjoy the protection of Article 10 of the Convention (see Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 166-68, 8 November 2016, and Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary, no. 37374/05, §§ 26-28, 14 April 2009 and the references cited therein). - EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 15428/16
SZUROVECZ v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2022 - 15758/13
The Court has previously applied Article 10 of the Convention to the activity of gathering information by journalists, when it was an essential preparatory step in their work as "public watchdogs" in a democratic society (see Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 83, ECHR 2015; Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006; Selmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 67259/14, § 61, 9 February 2017; Szurovecz v. Hungary, no. 15428/16, § 52, 8 October 2019; and Mándli and Others v. Hungary, no. 63164/16, § 45, 26 May 2020). - EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 63164/16
MÁNDLI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2022 - 15758/13
The Court has previously applied Article 10 of the Convention to the activity of gathering information by journalists, when it was an essential preparatory step in their work as "public watchdogs" in a democratic society (see Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 83, ECHR 2015; Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006; Selmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 67259/14, § 61, 9 February 2017; Szurovecz v. Hungary, no. 15428/16, § 52, 8 October 2019; and Mándli and Others v. Hungary, no. 63164/16, § 45, 26 May 2020).