Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,53003) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DA CUNHA FOLHADELA MOREIRA v. PORTUGAL
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 02.03.2005 - 71916/01
Entschädigungs- und Ausgleichsleistungsgesetzes über die Wiedergutmachung von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
71916/01 and 2 others, § 74 (c), ECHR 2005-V). - EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 63066/14
Schuldenschnitt in Griechenland: Die Umschuldung war legal
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
Thus, future income cannot be considered to constitute "possessions" unless it has already been earned or is definitely payable (see Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 64, ECHR 2007-I, and Mamatas and Others v. Greece, nos. 63066/14 and 2 others, § 86, 21 July 2016). - EGMR, 04.09.2007 - 45563/04
A.N.R.P.und 275 andere gegen Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
The Court also observes that a legitimate expectation must be based either on a legal provision or have a solid basis in the domestic case-law (see Associazione Nazionale Reduci and 275 Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 45563/04, 4 September 2007, and Von Maltzan and Others, cited above, § 112).
- EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 13341/14
DA SILVA CARVALHO RICO v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to decide what is "in the public interest" on social or economic grounds, and the Court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it is "manifestly without reasonable foundation" (see National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII; Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2006-VI; and Da Silva Carvalho Rico v. Portugal (dec.), no. 13341/14, § 37, 1 September 2015). - EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 62235/12
DA CONCEIÇÃO MATEUS AND SANTOS JANUÁRIO v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
62235/12 and 57725/12, § 18, 8 October 2013). - EGMR, 15.03.2001 - 30517/96
AUNOLA v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 71418/14
However, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not guarantee, as such, any right to a pension of a particular amount (see, for example, Aunola v. Finland (dec.), no. 30517/96, 15 March 2001, and Kjartan Ásmundsson, cited above, § 39).