Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 28297/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37533) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BERIDZE v. GEORGIA
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
BERIDZE v. GEORGIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 28297/10
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration submitted by the Government in the present case carefully in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary issues) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02
BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 28297/10
It recalls that it has already established in a number of cases, including those brought against Georgia, its practice concerning complaints about the allegations of ill-treatment by the police and lack of adequate investigation in that respect (see, for example, Begheluri v. Georgia, no. 28490/02, §§ 105-112, 7 October 2014; Davtyan v. Georgia, no. 73241/01, §§ 35-47, 27 July 2006) as well as interference with the right to hold a peaceful demonstration, in breach of Article 11 of the Convention (see, for example, Kakabadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 1484/07, §§ 84-93, 2 October 2012; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; and Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-102, 15 November 2007).