Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOHLHOFER AND MINARIK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding a violation sufficient Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03, 28464/04, 5344/05
• EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 32921/03

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03

  It must also be established that the degree of access afforded under the national legislation was sufficient to secure the individual's "right to a court", having regard to the rule of law in a democratic society (Petkoski and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 27736/03, § 40, 8 January 2009 which itself refers to Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, § 57).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03

  In addition, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention preclude any interference by the legislature with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of the dispute (Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 49).
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03

  It is for the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time; that is to say, that the remedy was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 32921/03

  The Court reiterates that an applicant may recover his costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V).

• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 4532/04

  ROMOKHOV v. RUSSIA

  In that respect the Court firstly notes that it is for the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that an effective remedy was available in theory and in practice at the relevant time; that is to say, that the remedy was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see, among other authorities, Kohlhofer and Minarik v. the Czech Republic, nos. 32921/03, 28464/04 and 5344/05, § 77, 15 October 2009).
• EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 24314/13

  FISCHER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  In judgment no. III. ÚS 2671/09 of 3 March 2011, the Constitutional Court interpreted the relevant provisions of the domestic law in a way that, in its view, was compatible with the Convention, taking into account especially the Court's judgment in Kohlhofer and Minarik v. the Czech Republic (nos. 32921/03, 28464/04 and 5344/05, 15 October 2009).
• EGMR, 13.10.2011 - 8992/07

  SOLARIS, S.R.O. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  32921/03, 28464/04 and 5344/05, §§ 40-70, 15 October 2009.
• EGMR, 10.07.2013 - 32921/03

  KOHLHOFER ET MINARIK ET 4 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  32921/03, 28464/04 and 5344/05 - Kohlhofer and Minarik and.
• EGMR, 12.01.2012 - 12266/07

  PEKÁRNY A CUKRÁRNY KLATOVY, A.S. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The mere fact that a measure benefits a private person does not mean that it cannot have pursued a public interest and a legitimate aim (see, mutatis mutandis, Kohlhofer and Minarik v. the Czech Republic, nos. 32921/03, 28464/04 and 5344/05, § 98, 15 October 2009).