Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.Y. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Tajikistan);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.Y. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  OTHER COMPLAINTS 17. A.Y. and F.K. also complained under Article 13 of the Convention that there had been no effective domestic remedies in respect of their complaints under Article 3. Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case (see paragraphs 7, 11 and 12 above) and that there is no need to examine the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  In so far as A.Y.'s and F.K.'s complaint concerns the risk of ill-treatment that they ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11

  NIZOMKHON DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  In so far as A.Y.'s and F.K.'s complaint concerns the risk of ill-treatment that they ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09

  GAFOROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  In so far as A.Y.'s and F.K.'s complaint concerns the risk of ill-treatment that they ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  K.I. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2023 - 29958/20

  In so far as A.Y.'s and F.K.'s complaint concerns the risk of ill-treatment that they ran in Tajikistan, the present case is identical to cases in which the Court previously established that individuals whose extradition was sought by Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted a vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Tajikistan (see K.I. v. Russia, no. 58182/14, 7 November 2017; Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890/11, 3 October 2013; and Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, 21 October 2010).

• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 27584/20

  K.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Therefore, taking into account the circumstances of S.K.'s case, which match the pattern of other cases where applicants last seen in the custody of State authorities have then disappeared (see, for example, Mukhitdinov v. Russia, no. 20999/14, § 62, 21 May 2015, and, as the most recent examples, A.Y. and Others v. Russia [Committee], no. 29958/20 and 2 others, §§ 8-12, 17 January 2023, and N.K. v. Russia [Committee], no. 45761/18, 29 March 2022), the Court is satisfied that on 10 September 2020 S.K. was illegally transferred by Russian State agents into the custody of North Korean officials.