Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 11 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04
• EGMR, 10.09.2015 - 37586/04
• EGMR - 37586/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 44079/98

  THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  The background to the case is described in detail in the Court's judgments in the cases of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria (nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX) and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005).

  The Committee of Ministers concluded the examination of application no. 44079/98 (United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria) and application no. 46336/99 (Ivanov and Others v. Bulgaria) on 8 June 2011, by adopting Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)46, which reads:.

• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  The background to the case is described in detail in the Court's judgments in the cases of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria (nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX) and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov v. Bulgaria (no. 44079/98, 20 October 2005).
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02

  Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  The fact that the national authorities should rely on grounds which the Court had, at the time when those authorities made their decisions, already found problematic is indicative of a troubling disregard for the Court's judgments and the applicants" right to freedom of peaceful assembly (see, mutatis mutandis, Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 83-88, ECHR 2009-..., and United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden and Ivanov, cited above, § 116).

 
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07

  Alexejew ./. Russland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 98, 21 October 2010).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92

  DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  A refusal to allow an individual to travel for the purpose of attending a meeting amounts to an interference as well (see Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 59-62, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  So do measures taken by the authorities during a rally, such as a dispersal of the rally or arrests of participants (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII, and Hyde Park and Others (nos. 5 and 6), cited above, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48), and penalties imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-02, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, §§ 75-77, 17 July 2008; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 77568/01

  PETKOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  Were that to be the case, that right, which, along with the rights to freedom of expression and association, and the right to take part in free and fair elections, is one of the essential features of a vigorous and healthy democracy, would be ineffective in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 77568/01, 178/02 and 505/02, § 79, ECHR 2009-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 33268/03

  ASHUGHYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  So do measures taken by the authorities during a rally, such as a dispersal of the rally or arrests of participants (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII, and Hyde Park and Others (nos. 5 and 6), cited above, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48), and penalties imposed for having taken part in a rally (see Ezelin, cited above, § 41; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Mkrtchyan v. Armenia, no. 6562/03, § 37, 11 January 2007; Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 100-02, 15 November 2007; Ashughyan v. Armenia, no. 33268/03, §§ 75-77, 17 July 2008; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 178/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  Were that to be the case, that right, which, along with the rights to freedom of expression and association, and the right to take part in free and fair elections, is one of the essential features of a vigorous and healthy democracy, would be ineffective in practice (see, mutatis mutandis, Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 77568/01, 178/02 and 505/02, § 79, ECHR 2009-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 63778/00

  ZELENI BALKANI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 37586/04

  First, the Government have not shown - by, for instance, citing relevant case-law - that such a claim would have had a reasonable prospect of success (see Zeleni Balkani v. Bulgaria, no. 63778/00, § 46, 12 April 2007, and Hyde Park and Others (nos. 5 and 6), cited above, § 34 in fine).