Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANZINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ANZINA v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09

  LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  The present case is identical to other Russian cases on entrapment, in which the Court found in the past violations on account of deficiencies in procedure for authorising undercover operations in the context of investigating offences concerning illegal distribution of drugs (see Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, 24 April 2014, and Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 66152/14

  KUZMINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  The Court has recently reiterated that that the Russian legal system does not provide for adequate and effective legal safeguards for authorising and supervising undercover operations, a structural problem which exposed applicants to arbitrary action by the police and prevented the domestic courts from conducting an effective judicial review of their entrapment pleas (see Kuzmina and Others v. Russia, nos. 66152/14 and 8 others, 20 April 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 15086/07

  Mord an Journalistin: Russland wegen Politkowskaja-Ermittlungen verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  In the absence of such documents, the Court finds no basis on which to accept that the costs and expenses claimed have actually been incurred by those applicants and rejects their claim for costs and expenses (see, among others, Udaltsov v. Russia, no. 76695/11, § 201, 6 October 2020, and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, §§ 89-90, 17 July 2018).

 
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 2257/12

  ZADUMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018, the finding of a violation under Article 6 constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present cases (see also Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 23200/10

  VESELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  The present case is identical to other Russian cases on entrapment, in which the Court found in the past violations on account of deficiencies in procedure for authorising undercover operations in the context of investigating offences concerning illegal distribution of drugs (see Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228/09 and 4 others, 24 April 2014, and Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 29431/05

  ZUBKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  29431/05 and 2 others, 7 November 2017).
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 66215/12

  KUMITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  66215/12 and 4 others, § 17, 10 July 2018, the finding of a violation under Article 6 constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present cases (see also Zadumov v. Russia, no. 2257/12, §§ 80-81, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 76695/11

  UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  In the absence of such documents, the Court finds no basis on which to accept that the costs and expenses claimed have actually been incurred by those applicants and rejects their claim for costs and expenses (see, among others, Udaltsov v. Russia, no. 76695/11, § 201, 6 October 2020, and Mazepa and Others v. Russia, no. 15086/07, §§ 89-90, 17 July 2018).
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 40442/07

  MANELYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2022 - 60757/12

  Therefore, the judicial review of the applicants' cases fell short of the standards developed in the Court's case-law in the light of Article 6 of the Convention (contrast Manelyuk and Others v. Russia [Committee] nos. 40442/07 and 3 others, §§ 34, 38-39 and 40-42, 8 October 2019).