Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.12.2002 - 66894/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,46032) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PEJIC v. CROATIA
Wird zitiert von ... (6)
- EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 45808/18
M.Ö. v. TURKEY
Where the applicant has designated a lawyer to represent him, as in the instant case, the six-month period runs from the date on which the applicant's lawyer was served with the final decision, notwithstanding the fact that the decision might only have been notified personally to the applicant later (see Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 21425/06, 10 November 2009; Çelik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 52991/99, ECHR 2004-X; and Pejic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 66894/01, 19 December 2002). - EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 38354/06
BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
This means that time starts to run when the applicant's representative receives notification of a decision, even if the applicant is not informed until later (see Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 21425/06, 10 November 2009; Çelik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 52991/99, ECHR 2004-X; Pejic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 66894/01, 19 December 2002). - EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 38333/06
BENET CZECH, SPOL. S R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
This means that time starts to run when the applicant's representative receives notification of a decision, even if the applicant is not informed until later (see Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 21425/06, 10 November 2009; Çelik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 52991/99, ECHR 2004-X; Pejic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 66894/01, 19 December 2002).
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 28402/06
JANKOVIC AND MANDIC v.
The Court further recalls that the six-month period runs from the date on which the applicant's lawyer became aware of the decision completing the exhaustion of the domestic remedies, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant only became aware of the decision later (see Keskin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36091/97, 7 September 1999; Bölükbas and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 37793/97, 12 October 1999; and Pejic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 66894/01, 19 December 2002). - EGMR, 23.09.2004 - 52991/99
CELIK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.09.2006 - 25694/03
ANDORKA v. HUNGARY
This means that time starts to run when the applicant's representative receives notification of a decision, even if the applicant is not informed until later (see Çelik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 52991/99, ECHR 2004-X; Pejic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 66894/01, 19 December 2002; Keskin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36091/97, 7 September 1999; Bölükbas and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 37793/97, 12 October 1999).