Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 39496/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,54161) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
POLONETS v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 35091/02
MIKHAÏLENKI ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 39496/02
Therefore, the Court finds that any further proceedings against the bailiffs would have been redundant in view of the fact that the delay in the enforcement of the judgment of 7 November 2001 was due to reasons which the bailiffs could not influence (see, among many others, Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02, and the following, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2004-...).