Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 73283/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,61014) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KÖSEOGLU v. TURKEY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 73283/01
The Court notes that it has recently revised its case-law concerning the applicability of Article 6 § 1 to disputes between the State and civil servants in its Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland judgment ([GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-...). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 73283/01
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 14399/88
MASSA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 73283/01
Relying on the Court's jurisprudence the Government contended that Article 6 was not applicable in the instant case, given that the dispute in question was not purely or essentially economic (see Neigel v. France, judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, p. 410, § 43); Francesco Lombardo v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, p. 26-27, § 17, Massa v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, § 26; Nicodemo v. Italy, judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1703, § 18; Huber v. France, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 37). - EGMR, 26.11.1992 - 11519/85
FRANCESCO LOMBARDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 73283/01
Relying on the Court's jurisprudence the Government contended that Article 6 was not applicable in the instant case, given that the dispute in question was not purely or essentially economic (see Neigel v. France, judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, p. 410, § 43); Francesco Lombardo v. Italy, judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, p. 26-27, § 17, Massa v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, § 26; Nicodemo v. Italy, judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1703, § 18; Huber v. France, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 37).